Back to YouthRights.org
Why don't you join now?!
To benefit from all NYRA has to offer, you
should join our thousands of happy members.

age of reason

About NYRA
Who We Are
What We Believe
What We've Done

Support
Merch
Donate

Membership
Join Now
Election
Chapters
Flyers
Downloads

News
Media
NYRA News
Blog
News Wire

Community
Forums
Chat
Gallery

Youth Rights
Drinking Age
Curfew
Voting Age
Quotes
Library

Contact Us
Related Links

Partners:

Youth Rights Research Here.

Dream it. Do it.



» 2007 » January

Time For Our Generation to Take the Lead

Filed under: IssuesAHullRichter @ 11:18 am

For centuries, our generation has worked and died so that America could move forward. Members of our generation rarely have received credit for our work. Teens have fought and died in the American Revolution, in the Civil War, in the World Wars, in Vietnam and in Iraq. American teens, throughout history have fought for civil rights, for voting rights and other rights and we have brought about fundamental changes in government. At the same time, teens have been denied rights allowed to older Americans and credit for their accomplishments.

Now, members of our generation are saying it’s time we got the rights and the power we have earned and deserve. On September 12, 2006, 17-year-old Jesse Hunter voted in the Minnesota Primary, after providing his correct date of birth and allowing polling officials to examine his driver’s license. He was later notified that he was being charged with felony voter fraud, a charge that is absurd on its face. Since when is telling the truth, while exercising your rights, a fraud? To youth across America, Jesse is a hero who took charge and exercised the right to have a say in his future. On December 19, 2006, the Patrick Henry Democratic Club of America (PHCD) declared him its Patriot of the Year for 2006. The PHDC is a national organization based in California. Its members include doctors, lawyers, professors, political candidates, ministers, performers, engineers, writers, students and others. These individuals, over a two-month period, looked through the accomplishments of various Americans and felt that the most patriotic act of 2006 was that of a 17-year old who took the opportunity to vote.

Over 400 Americans have died in Iraq without exercising the right Jesse took on behalf of himself and our generation. Those 400 were too young to vote in the last Presidential election before they died for a cause to which they could not say “no.” In view of the 400 dead Americans, age discrimination in voting should receive elevated scrutiny under the Equal Protection Clause of the 14th Amendment. The level of scrutiny is what determines if a law, such as the 18-year-old voting age, is unconstitutional under the Equal Protection Clause. The Constitution contains no minimum voting age as the 26th Amendment only establishes an age at which discrimination must end in voting. In taking a stand, Jesse was helping to prevent the likelihood of another 400 dying in Iraq or Iran or Venezuela without a chance to vote. His actions were a service to the county.

In 2006, California voters received a paper trail. This paper trail didn’t just drop in from heaven. It took a lot of work and years to bring it about. Back in 2003, Natasha Hull-Richter (then 11) and I (Alex Hull-Richter, then 13) wrote the resolution calling for a paper trail that was later adopted by the California Democratic Party. This was despite opposition from Christine Pelosi (Nancy’s daughter), the ACLU and California’s Common Cause, all of whom opposed a paper trail at the time.  Our resolution was the basis for the Democratic National Committee resolution calling for a paper-trail. Natasha and I went to then Secretary of State Kevin Shelley’s Help America Vote Act hearings and gave speeches on the dangers of electronic voting and the need for paper ballots or at least a paper trail if election outcomes were ever to be trusted again. The odds were against us. We were up against major civil liberty organizations who felt that the paper trail would result in computer jams and would disadvantage disabled voters. Shelley and his panel agreed with us and the result was that Shelley decreed there would be a voter-verifiable paper trail in all California elections, starting in 2006. Between 2003 and 2006, Shelley resigned, but his replacement, Bruce McPherson, could not undo the guarantee of a paper trail. Since 2003, the ACLU and California’s Common Cause have realized that we were correct and have joined us in supporting a paper trail. If Shelley and his HAVA panel had waited for the older activists to come around, Bruce McPherson (a Diebold advocate) would probably be Secretary of State for another four years. We had another coup in 2006. We helped elect Debra Bowen, a supporter of a lower voting age, to be California’s Secretary of State. In recognition of all this, the PHDC declared Natasha and myself Voting Rights Leaders of the Year, 2006.

It’s not enough that the adults have the right to have their votes counted. There are more than 75,000,000 potential voters who are not allowed to vote because of age discrimination. In 2005, Natasha got the California Democratic Party to adopt a resolution calling for lowering the voting age. She tried to get this into the 2006 California Democratic Party Platform. However, Christine Pelosi had her platform committee pediatrician, Dr. Jo Olson, make a presentation that those under the age of 18 have smaller, inferior brains and are not capable of rational or intelligent thought. After that, the members of the platform committee one by one (with one exception) spoke of how lazy and useless our generation is. That committee needs reforming or disbanding.

Not giving up, Natasha and I and other youth activists continued to speak to elected officials and found that there was tremendous support for lowering the voting age. A number of legislators signed our petition in support of putting it on the platform. Three of the 2006 gubernatorial candidates came out in support of lowering the voting age and a four called it a “great idea.” Debra Bowen (California’s new SOS) also suports lowering the voting age.

We got a bigger win from the membership of the Screen Actors Guild at its annual 2006 meeting, where the members voted by more than a 3 to 1 margin to support lowering the voting age. Members of SAG work with those under 18 and understand our abilities and intelligence more than any other group of professionals. This was an endorsement of our generation.

We also have strong support from one of the 2008 Presidential candidates, Dennis J. Kucinich, who has been endorsed by the Orange County Chapter of the National Youth Rights Association. November 7, 2006 proved that the voters have stopped listening to the media and have stopped allowing corporations to determine the outcome of elections. Dennis is expected to get the full anti-war vote in the next election as he is considered the only peace candidate in the election. In 2006, youth rights activists made a difference. We defeated anti-youth candidates, like Michael Fitzpatrick (who tried to ban us from the Internet). We need to make youth rights the deciding factor in the next election. We need to let every candidate for every office know that, if they want the job, they must come to us and convince us that they will help us get our rights. We must work to defeat all ageists, regardless of political affiliation.

On October 23, 2006, the last day to register to vote for the November 7, 2006 election, Natasha and I attempted to register to vote. We fully intended to vote in the early voting if we had been allowed to register and to vote. Natasha’s form was rejected. Mine was accepted, but I was not allowed to vote. Our goal is to put together an Equal Protection class action suit to lower or eliminate the voting age. We are hoping others will join us in this effort.

One setback our generation has had was with the California Democratic Assembly District Caucuses. Robert Jordan, a California Democratic Party(CDP) volunteer with too much authority, refused to allow those of us who had registered as Democrats at 17 to be listed in the caucuses for state delegate positions in the California Democratic Party (CDP) . In California, 17-year-olds can register but cannot vote. Under the old CDP rules and the new CDP rules adopted in January 2006, we were eligible. The refusal to allow us to have our name on the list was solely as a result of age discrimination. The Orange County Chapter of the National Youth Rights Association voted to condemn the discrimination as a violation of our civil rights.

Despite setbacks, we must continue to demand an end to ageism. It took a long time to for all American men to get the vote and even more time for all American women to get the vote. Now, voting is considered a fundamental right for all Americans over 18. The next step is to get everyone to accept that all Americans, regardless of age, have the right to vote.

Back in 1955, when Claudette Colvin refused to give up her seat on a bus and was arrested, a decision was made that she was too young to be a role model. Her teacher and mentor was sent in to copy her footsteps and get the glory. Claudette was forgotten. Our generation has already given up too much. It’s our turn to stand up and to demand our rights. Our generation changed the face of the civil rights movement. Our generation has changed the face of voting. It’s time that we got all of our rights and stopped taking backseats to those who claim superiority solely because of their age. It’s about time we classified ageism as a hate crime, just as bad as those hate crimes exercised against any other singled-out group. We are 75 million plus strong and we don’t have to settle for what little the ageists want to give us.

Many in Senate Back Mandatory HPV Vaccination

Filed under: Issues, EducationSciVille @ 7:57 pm

According to this article in the Washington Post, Maryland supports vaccinating middle school age girls with a drug to significantly fight cervical cancer.

I think it is great. Trouble is, the opposition. Look at this paragraph:

Attempts to make vaccination mandatory have been criticized by groups concerned about encouraging promiscuity or infringing on parents’ authority over their daughters’ health care. Some oppose such efforts because of health worries about vaccines in general. But many health advocates, among others, support the idea.

Would you look at that? Encouraging promiscuity. What nonsense! They only say this because the subject is sort of sexual. If it were about anything else, they wouldn’t worry about what may or may not be encouraged. Furthermore, how many girls do you know who decline sex for no other reason than “I don’t want cervical cancer!”? Between the choice of your daughter dying from cancer or having sex, why in the WORLD would these people choose the former?!

Also, let’s look at the other reason mentioned. Parents’ authority over their daughters’ health care. The words turn my stomach. They’re acting like this is any different from the myriad of other vaccinations you must have by certain grades. Not to mention it gives the most likely accurate impression of parents having much more of a say in their daughter’s medical care than the daughter herself. Doesn’t matter that it is her body. Just as long as they can continue to assert their dominance over their young, humanoid property, right?

You could argue requiring vaccinations is a youth rights issue in and of itself. I don’t know. It’s more of a public health issue to prevent epidemics. Of course, now that I think about it, cervical cancer isn’t exactly contagious. Unless the girl is promiscuous, I suppose. Funny how that works out. In that case, perhaps it’s a no-win situation for youth rights, as are many situations. If the vaccine were available but not required, might have idiot parents preventing their daughters from getting vaccinated, against the girl’s wishes, fearing she’d think it would be a green light to have lots of unprotected sex. With the vaccine required, that isn’t so much an issue, but still girls being vaccinated perhaps against their wishes. Hard to tell.

The Dawning of a New World View, Part 2

Filed under: IssuesKPalicz @ 1:00 pm

Took a while, but here is Part 2 from the Dawning of a New World View post last month.  It is my personal take on the issue.  Enjoy:

I was always at some level aware of the age hierarchy we live in. At various times I found it amusing, a minor nuisance not worth worrying about or something to rebel against, but I can’t ever remember actually supporting it.

My memory is shamefully bad, so I only retain snippets of my life before last Tuesday, but of those snippets, some are interesting. Like when I first started 1st grade, my grand entry into public school I made a private promise to myself that if I was ever punished for something I didn’t think I deserved I would fight it to the end. I don’t think I ever told anyone, but it was always in the back of my mind. I didn’t activate this pact until like sophomore year in high school after a conflict with my Spanish teacher (fun story, if you’re lucky I’ll tell it (retell it?) sometime). It wasn’t that I never got in trouble to that point, I just always figured I got what I had coming, hehe. But the point of course is that even in first grade (aka 6 years old) I recognized that the authorities and the school could be wrong and that it was my obligation to fight them when they were.

But other times I was rather amused with the whole way we were ranked and classified in society. In elementary school I’d sometimes call middle school or high school students “kids”, even though they were twice my age, because despite the fact they seemed to be damn near adults from my vantage point I knew that they were regarded as no better off than I was in the eyes of the world. So I’d be a smart ass and call them kids to piss them off and amuse myself by turning the typical hierarchy on its head by talking down to someone twice my age. And of course knowingly and unknowingly pointing out the absurdity of how our world worked.

So I always recognized these various elements and it always existed in the background of my life as I looked at my interactions with my parents or with teachers. It wasn’t until high school that thinking that this would be a worthwhile thing to analyze and fight back against. Till then I just had an uneasy co-existence with ageism.

Tales From the NYRA Office, Episode 1

Yesterday I went into our office for the first time. We rent a room inside the office of Common Cause on the 9th floor of 1133 19th St, NW in downtown Washington, DC. Right by the Farragut North metro stop. We are just over a block from the famous K Street where all the DC bigwigs, lobbyists and advocacy groups set up shop. Now NYRA has joined their ranks.

We don’t yet have the computers we need for the office so I just went in yesterday to set up furniture and make arrangements with the Common Cause folks. No one from Mobilizing America’s Youth was around, they’ll be in California till late January, so Kim, the Common Cause office manager, showed me NYRA’s room. The previous occupant seems to have just been one guy with a large desk and a chair. A computer was set up when I first arrived, but they came to take it away. Just a few odds & ends were left.

In the odds and ends I came across an action figure who I have promoted to status of official NYRA Office Mascot. He hasn’t been named yet, perhaps the forums can start a naming contest.

I needed more furniture though since I want to squeeze three people into that office. All day while I was working on moving stuff people kept passing by saying there is no way I’ll fit three people in there, hehe. But it isn’t hard to do if you don’t mind close quarters. Kim directed me to a room where they keep all their excess furniture and said I could take what I want from there. The room was piled to the ceiling with filing cabinets and shelves and such. You couldn’t take a step inside the room before facing a solid wall of furniture.

(more…)

A Place of Our Own

For those who don’t know, NYRA, for the first real time in its history has an official office. Last year we spent a few months sharing some space with Fairvote but we were on borrowed time and the office was never truly ours. But now with our new grant NYRA has at long last found a place of our own.

As someone who has been with this organization for seven years now it is difficult to explain how it feels for this day to have finally come. This organization - and myself personally - have waited and dreamed of this day for a long time.

Anyone who has been around NYRA long enough knows very well the many challenges we have faced over the years. Running an all volunteer organization has many pitfalls. It has proven exceedingly difficult to rely on a volunteers you only know through the Internet who are spread all around the country. For most people the responsibility of volunteering virtually never feels the same as volunteering face to face and thus many people put it on the back burner. This movement is simply too important to be put on the back burner.

Even for more committed staff, like myself, it has proven exceedingly difficult to work from home and stay on task and productive. Working in an isolated environment with dozens of distractions is a recipe for frustration, loneliness and laziness as I have found out over the last many years. For everyone involved an office gives us that face to face, daily interaction that fosters a professional, productive work environment that we need to move to the next level.

But an office isn’t just a place to work, it is a sign of legitimacy and a physical place for the organization to call home. NYRA has been dismissed in the past as an amateur, flash in the pan organization, or just a do-nothing website full of whiny kids. Now we have a professional office on the 9th floor of a downtown DC high rise, a conference room, a copy room, and everything else. So the next time someone chuckles when you mention NYRA, show them our office and tell them we are here to stay.




NYRA   -    1133 19th St., NW   -    9th Floor   -    Washington, DC   -    20036