<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Indignities of Being Young</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.youthrights.org/2006/01/18/the-indignities-of-being-young/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.youthrights.org/2006/01/18/the-indignities-of-being-young/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 14 Mar 2010 13:15:03 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: SDavidson</title>
		<link>http://blog.youthrights.org/2006/01/18/the-indignities-of-being-young/#comment-30</link>
		<dc:creator>SDavidson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jan 2006 03:23:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.youthrights.org/2006/01/18/the-indignities-of-being-young/#comment-30</guid>
		<description>I guess it depends on what you deem "childhood."  The protectionists have tried to turn childhood in to a state of complete dependence and blissful ignorance that isn't really blissful at all.  This is what "childhood" means to most people, and I must say that it is what initially comes to mind when I hear the word.  If this is childhood, the youth rights movement is working toward its destruction and I could not be happier.  Childhood, as an eighteen year sentence, is what John Holt was escaping from.  Good riddance!

But that is not childhood.  That is a fabrication of the ageist machine.  Instead, we see childhood as a state where one can be informed, competent, and respected, but at the same time lack the cynicism and apathy common among older people.  This ought to be preserved.

Great entry.  I really liked some of the rhetoric you utilized.  It was refreshing to hear the term "youth apartheid."</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I guess it depends on what you deem &#8220;childhood.&#8221;  The protectionists have tried to turn childhood in to a state of complete dependence and blissful ignorance that isn&#8217;t really blissful at all.  This is what &#8220;childhood&#8221; means to most people, and I must say that it is what initially comes to mind when I hear the word.  If this is childhood, the youth rights movement is working toward its destruction and I could not be happier.  Childhood, as an eighteen year sentence, is what John Holt was escaping from.  Good riddance!</p>
<p>But that is not childhood.  That is a fabrication of the ageist machine.  Instead, we see childhood as a state where one can be informed, competent, and respected, but at the same time lack the cynicism and apathy common among older people.  This ought to be preserved.</p>
<p>Great entry.  I really liked some of the rhetoric you utilized.  It was refreshing to hear the term &#8220;youth apartheid.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
